There’s something about Liverpool’s transfer planning that still doesn’t quite make sense to me.
When Liverpool won the Premier League title, plenty of supporters were already saying the same thing:
The midfield needed strengthening.
Not necessarily because the existing players were poor.
But because Liverpool needed more balance, more defensive security and another midfielder capable of controlling games.
The biggest question was around the No.6 position.
And yet, when Liverpool went into the transfer market, the answer was to spend a huge amount of money on Florian Wirtz — a No.10.
I absolutely love Wirtz as a player.
But that wasn’t the position I thought needed strengthening most.
And looking back now, I have to ask:
What exactly was the plan?
The problem was already obvious
Liverpool had just won the league.
That should have been the perfect opportunity to strengthen from a position of power.
Instead of waiting for problems to appear, the club could have looked at the squad and asked:
Where are we short?
Where do we need more competition?
What happens if our midfield gets overrun?
Who can protect the defence?
Who can control games when Liverpool aren’t dominating possession?
Those questions were being asked by supporters long before the current problems became obvious.
The concern wasn’t that Liverpool didn’t have quality midfielders.
They did.
The concern was balance.
Then came Florian Wirtz
And this is where I thought Liverpool must have had a plan.
Because signing Wirtz was clearly a massive statement.
He’s an outstanding footballer and one of the most talented attacking midfielders in Europe.
Liverpool didn’t spend that kind of money without having a reason.
Wirtz was brought in to play as a No.10 and provide creativity between the lines. Liverpool’s official profile describes him as an attacking midfielder, while the Premier League confirmed his arrival in June 2025.
So I assumed there was something else coming.
I thought:
They must be planning to sign a proper midfielder as well.
Maybe a No.6.
Maybe a powerful No.8.
Maybe somebody who could give Liverpool the defensive platform that had been missing since Fabinho’s departure.
But it never really happened.
Surely Wirtz wasn’t supposed to solve everything?
This is the part I struggle with.
Wirtz can press.
He can work hard.
He can drop deeper.
He can help Liverpool control possession.
But he’s not the player I would have identified as the solution to Liverpool’s midfield problem.
If the issue was defensive balance, Wirtz wasn’t the obvious answer.
If the issue was protecting the defence, Wirtz wasn’t the obvious answer.
If the issue was winning the ball back and controlling transitions, Wirtz wasn’t the obvious answer.
He was another attacking weapon.
And Liverpool already had attacking talent.
The problem hasn’t gone away
Fast-forward and we’re still talking about Liverpool’s midfield balance.
Recent criticism has focused heavily on the lack of a defensive-minded midfielder, with FourFourTwo arguing that Liverpool’s midfield issue remains unresolved and that the team lacks the kind of player who can provide protection and control during transitions.
That’s exactly why I keep coming back to the summer when Wirtz arrived.
Because the warning signs weren’t new.
They were already there.
Winning the league should have made the decision easier
This is what frustrates me most.
Liverpool weren’t rebuilding a team from scratch.
They had just won the Premier League.
They had a squad capable of winning the title.
That meant the club didn’t need to make ten changes.
They needed to identify the weaknesses and improve them.
And midfield looked like one of those areas.
Instead, Liverpool invested heavily in attacking quality.
Again, I’m not criticising Wirtz himself.
Far from it.
I’d sign Florian Wirtz again.
The question is why Liverpool didn’t also address the obvious weakness.
Did Liverpool believe the existing midfield was good enough?
Perhaps that was the thinking.
Maybe the coaching staff believed Ryan Gravenberch could develop into the deeper midfielder they wanted.
Maybe Alexis Mac Allister was viewed as capable of playing that role.
Maybe Dominik Szoboszlai’s physicality and work rate were considered sufficient.
Maybe the tactical system was supposed to compensate for the lack of a traditional No.6.
And that would at least explain the decision.
But if that was the plan, it needed to work.
Because football doesn’t care what the plan looked like on paper.
If the midfield doesn’t give the defence enough protection, opponents will eventually find the space.
I’m not saying Liverpool should have ignored Wirtz
This is important.
I don’t want this to become:
“Liverpool signed Wirtz instead of a midfielder.”
That’s not really fair.
Liverpool could have signed Wirtz and strengthened the midfield.
That’s what I wanted.
That’s what I still want.
Wirtz gives Liverpool something they didn’t previously have.
A genuine elite-level creative No.10.
But adding another attacking midfielder doesn’t automatically fix a structural weakness elsewhere.
You need balance.
Maybe this was always the bigger mistake
For me, the issue isn’t that Liverpool got their priorities completely wrong.
It’s that they didn’t finish the job.
They identified one area where they could dramatically improve the team.
They went and got Wirtz.
But they didn’t seem to give the same urgency to the midfield position that supporters had been worried about.
And now we’re still having exactly the same conversation.
Where is the No.6?
Who protects the defence?
Who gives Liverpool control when games become chaotic?
Those questions haven’t disappeared.
Wirtz isn’t the problem
I’ll say it again:
Florian Wirtz isn’t the problem.
He’s a brilliant footballer.
The problem is squad construction.
If Liverpool had signed Wirtz and then brought in a dominant defensive midfielder, I’d have been delighted.
Imagine having Wirtz creating chances while a top-class No.6 gives the team the platform to attack.
That would have made far more sense to me.
Instead, Liverpool added another weapon to the front end of the team while leaving a question mark in the middle of the pitch.
Liverpool must finally address it
I genuinely thought Liverpool must have had a plan when they signed Wirtz.
I thought there was another move coming.
I thought the club understood what supporters had been saying about the midfield.
But looking at it now, I’m not convinced they did.
Liverpool won the league.
The midfield still needed strengthening.
The club signed a world-class No.10.
And somehow, we’re still asking for the same thing.
A proper midfielder.
A player who can protect the defence.
A player who can control games.
A player who gives Liverpool the balance they need.
Wirtz was a brilliant signing.
But Liverpool needed more than one brilliant signing.
And for me, that’s the frustrating part.
They already had a league-winning team.
They didn’t need to reinvent it.
They just needed to identify the weaknesses — and fix them.
Jamie (The Kopite View)