I’ve called Dominik Szoboszlai Liverpool’s version of Bruno Fernandes on more than one occasion, for both good and bad reasons, and I stand by that comparison.
Before anyone takes that the wrong way, I’m not questioning Szoboszlai’s ability. He is an excellent footballer, has an outstanding engine and possesses plenty of qualities that Liverpool need.
But there is a question Andoni Iraola may eventually have to answer: are Liverpool actually a more balanced team when Szoboszlai isn’t playing?
It might sound harsh, especially when we are talking about one of the most talented midfielders in the squad. However, football is about more than individual quality. It is about how the pieces fit together, and whether the team functions better as a unit.
Liverpool’s recent performances have given us plenty to think about.
Why I compare Szoboszlai to Bruno Fernandes
The comparison with Bruno Fernandes is not about saying the two players are identical. They have different qualities, different roles and different ways of influencing a match.
But there are similarities in the way they approach football.
Both are technically gifted, ambitious players who want to make things happen. They are willing to attempt difficult passes, take risks and get involved in attacking situations. They want to influence games rather than simply sit back and keep possession ticking over.
That can be a huge positive.
Liverpool need players who are brave on the ball, who can break lines and who are prepared to take responsibility when a match needs changing. Szoboszlai certainly has those qualities.
His work rate is another major strength. He covers enormous distances, presses aggressively and gives his team energy. He is also capable of producing moments of real quality from distance and in the final third.
However, that desire to influence everything can have a downside.
Sometimes, the most effective thing a midfielder can do is keep the game simple, hold their position and allow the players around them to flourish.
That is where my comparison has a less flattering side.
Is trying to do too much affecting Liverpool’s balance?
Szoboszlai is the sort of player who wants to be involved in everything. He wants to press, create, carry the ball forward and make things happen around the opposition’s penalty area.
Those are admirable qualities, but there is a fine line between being influential and trying to do too much.
Liverpool need structure in midfield. They need players who understand when to advance and when to hold their position, when to press and when to protect the defence.
If too many midfielders want to operate in similar areas, the team can become stretched. The defensive protection can suffer, passing options can disappear and the forwards can become isolated.
This is not necessarily Szoboszlai’s fault. It is also a question of how the manager builds the midfield around him.
But if Liverpool look more settled when he is absent, Iraola has to examine why.
Is it because another midfielder offers better positional discipline? Is it because the responsibilities are distributed more clearly? Or is it simply that the team has found a better balance with the players currently available?
These are legitimate questions, and they deserve proper consideration rather than being dismissed as criticism of an individual player.
Liverpool’s recent performances raise an interesting question
Szoboszlai missed the Brighton match after picking up an injury against Brentford, and Liverpool went on to secure a 2-0 victory at Anfield.
Florian Wirtz and Alexander Isak scored in the first half, while the team kept a clean sheet to claim a much-needed Premier League home win.
That was an encouraging performance, but it would be wrong to suggest one victory proves Liverpool are better without Szoboszlai.
There are too many variables involved. Opponents differ, players return from injury, and Iraola has been rotating his side during a demanding run of fixtures.
Liverpool also beat Villarreal 4-3 in the Champions League, with Szoboszlai unavailable for that match as well. The attacking output in that game was impressive, although conceding three goals showed that there are still defensive issues to address.
The interesting point is not that Liverpool have suddenly become a better team without him. It is that they have produced encouraging performances while finding alternative ways to structure the midfield.
That gives Iraola something to assess when Szoboszlai returns.
The midfield combination matters more than the individual
For me, this is the biggest issue.
Szoboszlai is an excellent player, but no midfielder should automatically walk into the starting XI regardless of how the team is performing.
Iraola needs to find the right combinations. Alexis Mac Allister needs the right support, Ryan Gravenberch needs a role that suits his strengths, and Liverpool need enough defensive protection to allow their creative players to attack.
The question is whether Szoboszlai is best used as a more advanced midfielder, whether he needs a more disciplined partner behind him, or whether another combination gives Liverpool greater control.
There is no doubt he offers energy and quality. But the manager must decide how those attributes fit into the bigger picture.
A team can have its best individual players on the pitch and still lack balance. Equally, leaving an outstanding player out can sometimes make the overall system work better.
That is the challenge Iraola faces.
And with Liverpool competing across several competitions, there should be enough football for more than one midfield combination to have an important role.
I’m not writing Szoboszlai off
Let me make this clear: I am not saying Liverpool should sell Szoboszlai or that he is not good enough to play for the club.
Far from it.
He has the ability, attitude and work rate to be a major player for Liverpool for years to come. He is still capable of improving, and finding the right role for him could bring even more out of his game.
But being a good footballer and being the right fit for a particular midfield combination are two different things.
The same applies to Bruno Fernandes at Manchester United. His creativity and influence can be invaluable, but the team around him still needs the right structure to make the most of those qualities.
That is why I have made the comparison, and why I stand by it.
The positive side is that Szoboszlai can change a game. The other side is that Liverpool must ensure his desire to influence proceedings does not come at the expense of the team’s overall shape.
It is a tactical question, not a personal attack.
The verdict: Iraola has a big decision to make
Liverpool have looked encouraging in recent matches, and their 2-0 win over Brighton was another step in the right direction.
Now the challenge is to build consistency.
When Szoboszlai returns, Iraola has to decide whether he goes straight back into the starting XI or whether the manager sticks with a combination that is working.
Reputation should not decide that. Performances, tactical suitability and the balance of the team should.
Szoboszlai is too talented to be dismissed, but Liverpool are too important for any individual to be bigger than the system.
So, is it just a coincidence that Liverpool look more balanced without him?
I think it is a question worth asking, even if the answer is not as simple as saying the team is better without him.
The next few weeks should tell us more. If Liverpool continue to look organised, create chances and pick up results, Iraola will have a genuine selection dilemma when Szoboszlai is ready to return.
And that is a good problem to have — provided the manager makes the right decision for the team.
Jamie – (The Kopite View)
