Arne Slot did not hide his frustration when discussing recent VAR decisions — and his comments will resonate with many Liverpool supporters.
Speaking about two similar incidents that led to very different outcomes, Slot said:
“In both situations, the referee didn’t give a red card. In one situation the VAR overturned it, so at least one of them has to be a mistake.”
It was a pointed remark.
And it highlights a growing issue in the Premier League — inconsistency.
The Two Incidents
In one case, Maxence Lacroix was sent off for denying a goalscoring opportunity (DOGSO) on Matheus Cunha after VAR intervened.
In another, Marc Guehi received only a yellow card for a similar foul on Mohamed Salah.
Both on-field referees initially opted against a red card.
Only one decision was overturned.
And that’s where the frustration lies.
Same Threshold — Different Outcome?
DOGSO is meant to be clear in law.
If a player denies a clear goalscoring opportunity, it should result in a red card.
But if two comparable scenarios lead to two different punishments, the question becomes:
Where is the threshold?
Slot’s point wasn’t emotional — it was logical.
If VAR intervenes in one case but not the other, then consistency is being compromised.
And consistency is the entire purpose of VAR.
The Bigger Problem
Managers don’t expect perfection.
They expect uniform application.
What frustrates coaches, players and supporters alike is the unpredictability of interpretation.
When decisions feel random rather than rule-based, trust erodes.
Slot’s comments reflect a wider sentiment across the league.
VAR was introduced to reduce controversy.
Instead, it often relocates it.
It’s About Clarity, Not Favouritism
This isn’t about claiming bias.
It’s about standards.
If referees are advised not to send players off without VAR confirmation, then VAR must apply identical logic across similar situations.
Otherwise, you end up with confusion.
And confusion breeds frustration.
Final Thought
Slot rarely speaks out without purpose.
This wasn’t anger — it was a measured observation.
“At least one of them has to be a mistake.”
That line says everything.
Because if the same action produces two different consequences, the system isn’t clear.
And clarity is what VAR promised to deliver.
If you’d like, I can give you a more provocative headline that will drive serious debate and clicks.
Jamie (The Kopite View)
