Liverpool are reportedly planning to open talks with Virgil van Dijk over a new two-year contract extension.
The club want their captain to remain at Anfield for at least another season, with discussions expected over his future.
And honestly?
I’m absolutely fine with it.
Because even though Van Dijk is now 35, I still believe Liverpool need him.
Liverpool want more from Virgil
According to the latest reports, Liverpool are preparing to discuss a potential two-year extension with Van Dijk.
The idea would be to keep the Dutchman at Anfield beyond his current deal and potentially give him another two seasons with the club.
That would be a significant commitment to a player who has already given Liverpool some of the greatest years of his career.
But I don’t think this should simply be about sentiment.
Liverpool need to ask one question:
Is Virgil van Dijk still good enough to play an important role?
For me, the answer is yes.
He is still the leader
There is something different about Liverpool when Van Dijk is on the pitch.
He isn’t simply a centre-back.
He’s the captain.
He’s the organiser.
He’s the voice at the back.
And he’s still one of the players Liverpool’s younger defenders can learn from.
That is particularly important now that the club are building a new-look defence around players such as Jérémy Jacquet and Ronald Araújo.
Liverpool can develop the next generation while still having Van Dijk providing the experience.
That combination could be incredibly valuable.
Two years could actually make sense
Some supporters will understandably question whether Liverpool should give a 35-year-old another two-year deal.
I can understand that argument.
Centre-backs don’t get any younger, and Liverpool cannot afford to become sentimental when making important squad decisions.
But a two-year contract doesn’t necessarily mean Van Dijk has to play every single game.
In fact, I’d argue the opposite.
Liverpool should be thinking about how they manage his workload.
There will be Premier League matches.
Champions League games.
Domestic cups.
International football.
Injuries.
Suspensions.
The schedule is relentless.
Having Van Dijk available for the biggest matches could be more important than having him play every single week.
Look at what he still brings
Liverpool’s 2-0 victory over Ipswich earlier this season also showed why Van Dijk remains so important.
The Reds kept their first clean sheet of the campaign, with Van Dijk leading the defence.
And then came the Champions League win over Atlético Madrid.
Liverpool came from behind to win 2-1 at Anfield, showing the character that has become such an important part of this team.
Van Dijk remains at the centre of that leadership group.
Liverpool aren’t simply keeping an ageing defender.
They could be keeping one of the most experienced leaders in the squad.
But Liverpool must plan for life after him
This is the important part.
If Liverpool give Van Dijk another two-year contract, they cannot use that as an excuse to delay succession planning.
The club still need to identify the defender who will eventually replace him.
Jacquet could be part of that future.
Araújo could be part of it too.
There will inevitably be other young defenders coming through.
But Liverpool need to keep building.
Because one day, Van Dijk won’t be there.
And when that day eventually comes, Liverpool need to be ready.
Would I give him two years?
Yes.
If the finances are sensible, I’d give him the two years.
I’d also be perfectly comfortable with Liverpool managing his minutes more carefully as he gets older.
Van Dijk doesn’t need to play 50 games a season anymore.
He needs to be fit and ready for the matches where Liverpool need his experience, leadership and quality most.
And there is another factor.
You don’t replace Virgil van Dijk simply by buying another centre-back.
You replace his footballing ability.
You replace his leadership.
You replace his experience.
You replace his personality inside the dressing room.
That’s much harder.
Keep Virgil
Liverpool have already seen what happens when experienced leaders leave.
The squad changes.
The dressing room changes.
The responsibility moves onto younger players.
There is nothing wrong with that eventually.
But there is no reason to rush it.
If Van Dijk is still performing at the required level, Liverpool should keep him.
And if the club genuinely believe he can continue contributing for another couple of seasons, I have no problem with a two-year extension.
Let him finish the story
Virgil van Dijk arrived at Liverpool as a world-record defender.
He became a Premier League champion.
A Champions League winner.
A captain.
A leader.
And one of the greatest defenders of the modern Liverpool era.
His story at Anfield isn’t finished yet.
If Liverpool want to give him another two years, I’m all for it.
Just make sure the club are simultaneously preparing for the day when they eventually have to replace him.
Because for now?
Keep Virgil.
We should enjoy him while we’ve still got him.
Jamie (The Kopite View)
Leave a Reply